Not many tools have a clause library, based on substantiated data. Genie does!

May 6, 2025
Let's compare LegalMation and tiktok成人版 on features, pricing, reviews and market focus. Let's test the accuracy, security and compliance of their Legal AI too.
tiktok成人版 is a secure intelligent platform that streamlines contract drafting, reviewing, and editing with cutting-edge, AI-powered tools.
鉁 AI-superpowered contract drafting, collaboration & review
鉁 Automated first draft litigation documents including complaints, answers, discovery requests/responses in minutes rather than hours
鉁 Lawyer-supported AI and ML at the core of the platform
鉁 Purpose-built AI specifically trained on litigation documents and court filings
鉁 Enterprise-grade security measures in place
鉁 Enterprise-grade security with encryption
鉁 Compliant with major security standards, ISO27001 and SOC2
鉁 SOC 2 compliant
鉁 You own the IP聽of your data. We don't train our models on your data. None of our partners train their models on your data.
鉁 Client documents not used for training; data privacy controls
鉂 Multiple authentication options (coming soon) (request this feature)
鈥
鉁 SSO and multi-factor authentication
鉁 Granular user permissions and access control features (document level, project level, organization level, party level)
鉁 Role-based access controls
鉁 Compliant with GDPR and other privacy regulations
鈥
鉁 GDPR and CCPA compliant
鉁 Industry-leading AI-assisted contract drafting capabilities (all expected provisions and sections over 20 pages)
鉂 Limited contract drafting capabilities as platform focuses on litigation documents rather than transactional work
鉁 Built-in real-time collaboration features just like Office365 or Google Docs (No need to download your red-lined version, and make it editable, then send it on - it's all doable within Genie)
鉂 Basic collaboration but not focused on real-time co-editing
鉁 Powerful AI-driven contract analysis, red/amber/green flag reviews every clause (industry-leading improvements coming in 2025)
鉂 Focused on litigation document analysis rather than commercial contract review
鉁 Manage your projects and organise your own template and clause library
鉁 Automated first draft litigation documents including complaints, answers, discovery requests/responses in minutes rather than hours
鉂 No 'dumb' automated workflows. Agentic workflows coming in 2025
鉁 Workflow tools designed for litigation document review and approval
鉁 Full numbering support + AI auto-styling and formatting (coming soon)
鉁 Handles complex legal formatting for litigation documents
鉂 Not integrated with legal and business tools beyond full .docx compatibility. If you can use a word doc with it, you can use Genie with it.
鉁 Integrations with major document management systems like iManage and NetDocuments
鉂 Just export to .docx and use your existing provider (request this feature)
鉂 No native e-signature integration
鉁 Company and user level reporting and analytics (on request)
鉁 Analytics on time savings and productivity for litigation tasks
鉁 AI-powered document assembly
鉁 Automated assembly of litigation documents like answers, discovery responses
鉁 Market-leading AI-powered document editing: Ask Genie to edit your styling, reformat a table, or suggestion new clause text. As tracked changes, and private per party. Genie assists with and automates entire workflows, it doesn't just produce text responses.
鉁 AI-powered document editing within litigation context
鉂 Top-level AI Legal Research available as AI chat within the legal document, some prompting required (request this feature)
鉂 Limited legal research integration compared to research-focused platforms
鉁 Negotiation tools for multi-party clause-by-clause agreements
鉂 Not designed for contract negotiation
鉂 No advanced data extraction or OCR capabilities (request this feature)
鉁 Strong data extraction from litigation complaints and discovery documents
鉁 Mobile-optimised Web App
鉂 Limited mobile functionality
鉂 Coming soon (request this feature)
鉁 Integration with major cloud storage providers
鉁 Community clause library available for creating modular contracts
鉂 No community clause library
Coming soon - 鉁 A library of your private clauses usable only by your legal team
鉂 Limited capabilities focused on litigation templates rather than clause libraries
鉁 Community template library available to create modular contracts
鉂 No community template library
鉁 Bring your own library of private templates usable only by your legal team, within Genie
鉁 Ability to create and maintain private templates for litigation responses
鉁 Seamless integration with Microsoft Word, full styling, tables, formatting compatibility
鉁 Documents can be exported to Microsoft Word
鉁 No known issues (Pre-formatted templates, consistent formatting, tables, cross-version compatibility)
鉂 Some users report inconsistencies when heavily modifying automated outputs
鉁 Generally positive reviews
鉂 Limited application outside litigation context; some limitations in complex or unusual cases
鉁 Multiple support channels available including phone, whatsapp, email and live chat
鉁 Email, phone, and chat support
鉁 Available with our custom plans
鉁 Available for enterprise clients
鉁 For our custom plans, get setup within 3 days with a guided onboarding plan
鉁 Guided implementation with training sessions
鉁 Established AI-focused legal tech company
鉁 Founded in 2016, focused on AI for litigation documents
鉁 Founded in 2017, deep AI integration from inception. A thick layer built with AI specialists and senior lawyers to ensure the models produce high quality legally customised outputs
鉁 2016 - Early pioneer in legal AI automation for litigation
鉁 Our AI models are built using proprietary intelligence and research supported by UCL, Imperial College London and Oxford University. Rigorous testing process to ensure the outputs are accurate
鉂 Details on AI accuracy and transparency not provided
鉁 Over 110,000 companies have registered to use the Genie platform in total, including 11 FTSE100 firms, 20 Global200 firms, a number of top US banks, and two of the 鈥榖ig four鈥 UK supermarket chains.
鉁 Used by AmLaw 100 firms and Fortune 500 legal departments, including Walmart and several major insurers
鉁 3rd party and proprietary AI models
鈥
鉁 Native platform with document output capabilities
鉁 Cloud-based (SaaS)
鉂 Deployment options not clearly stated
鉁 Suitable for in-house legal, law firms, and SMEs
鉁 Litigation-focused law firms, corporate legal departments with litigation exposure
鉁 Built as a platform which is versatile across various industries. Focus areas are construction, manufacturing, consultancy and legal services.
鈥
鉁 Particularly strong in employment, personal injury, and commercial litigation
鉁 120+ jurisdictions including the UK, California, Texas, India, Australia, South Africa, Singapore, France, and Germany.
鈥
鉁 Coverage for multiple U.S. state and federal jurisdictions including California, New York, Texas, Florida, and Illinois
鉁 Generous free plan. Transparent subscription plans to suit different needs. Custom plans for orgs handling more than 10 documents per month.
鉂 Subscription-based pricing based on volume of documents processed, typically starting at $25,000-50,000 annually for small to mid-sized organizations
鉁 Offers SLAs for custom plans, specifics not public
鈥
鉁 99.9% uptime for enterprise clients
鉁 Fortnightly legal prompt training sessions from ex-Clifford Chance Legal Engineers;
鈥
There's also an active Slack community ()
Community & events: 鉁 Regular webinars on litigation efficiency and legal AI adoption; user conferencesTraining: 鉁 Comprehensive video tutorials and documentationPrompt Training: 鉂 Basic training on system use but limited advanced prompt engineering
Self-Serve:聽鉁 1-click, no email address required, no card required
鈥
Sales:聽鉁 2-3 weeks from pilot to full team adoption
Self-serve: 鉂 No immediate self-serve option; requires account setupSales: 鉂 Typically 2-4 weeks from purchase to implementation
鉁 Simple 3-step process: try with your document, explore your scenarios, receive 360掳 assessment
鉁 1-2 weeks from agreement to full implementation
Pilot: 鉁 Structured pilot with client documents and ROI analysisImplementation Timeline: 鉂 Typically 2-4 weeks from purchase to implementation
鉁 Consultative, transparent pricing, no hard selling
鉂 Traditional enterprise sales process with demonstrations
鉁 Firefish reduced contract review time by 50%, from 2.5 hrs to 1.25 hrs per document, saving 15+ hrs weekly per person
鉁 AmLaw 100 firm reduced time spent drafting answers to complaints from 6-10 hours to less than 1 hour
鉁 Average 60% time savings on contract drafting; 50% reduction in review cycles; ROI typically 3x cost
鉁 80-90% time savings on litigation document drafting; average cost savings of $1,500-2,500 per litigation response
Can鈥檛 find the right template? Create the bespoke agreement in minutes by conversing with our AI and tailoring to your needs
Ask Genie to edit your document in the same way you鈥檇 ask a paralegal. Genie makes track changes, and explains its thinking just like a junior lawyer would.
Import 100+ page docx. files and run a clause-by-clause red flag review in 3 minutes. Chat with Genie to understand anything about your document.